Sie lesen aktuell unserer Archiv. Die aktuelle Webseite befindet sich unter: iep-berlin.de
You are currently reading our archive. The current webseite is located at: iep-berlin.de/en/

issue 1/2021 of integration

Issue 1/2021 of integration takes stock of and reflects on the EU Council presi­dencies of Germany and Portugal, COVID-19 pandemic as a stress test for the EU, EU migration policy and the rule of law conditionality.

Rising vacci­nation and falling infection figures as well as the first (almost) regular European Council in Porto give hope for the fight against the pandemic. Never­theless, the European Union is not lacking for challenges. Both the German and the Portuguese Council Presi­dencies had to face these. Issue 1/2021 of integration takes stock of this and looks ahead.

Katrin Böttger and Mathias Jopp explain how the German Federal Government was able to success­fully meet the high expec­ta­tions of its Council Presi­dency in the second half of 2020 and reach compro­mises on major projects such as the Multi­annual Financial Framework or the agree­ments with the United Kingdom and China. The task of the subse­quent Portuguese Presi­dency is now to implement the decisions and also to address those issues that could not be tackled in the last half of 2020, explains Minna Ålander. In her forum contri­bution, she shows the possi­bil­ities Portugal has to set its own prior­ities. Vittoria Meißner et al. draw conclu­sions from the drastic pandemic experience for the EU’s future resilience and agency, both inter­nally and exter­nally in the face of global challenges. The COVID 19 pandemic was also decisive in the agreement on rule-of-law condi­tion­ality in the distri­b­ution of EU funds. It gave the issue new urgency and opened a “window of oppor­tunity”, as Ellen Bos and Kristina Kurz discuss in their contri­bution. Florian Trauner analyses in his article the asylum and migration package presented by the Commission and sets out the idea and functioning of the new approach of “mandatory but flexible solidarity”.


The German EU Presidency 2020: Selective Federalisation of the Integration Process 

Katrin Böttger and Mathias Jopp

This article analyses the most important issues and decisions of the German EU Council Presi­dency, but also its “leftovers”. Almost beyond expec­ta­tions, the German Government proved to be a successful mediator and honest broker for viable compro­mises in a number of conflicting areas. Hence, it was possible in the second half of 2020 to resolve complex EU financing issues, prevent a no-deal Brexit through a trade agreement with the United Kingdom, conclude an investment agreement with China and achieve the adoption of a rule of law mechanism against corruption and clientele economy in the use of EU funds by national actors. During the German Presi­dency, once again in European integration, a central­ization of important tasks at the Brussels level can be identified, combined with a partial strength­ening of supra­na­tional institutions.


Introducing a Rule of Law Conditionality in the European Union: the Coronavirus Crisis as a Window of Opportunity 

Ellen Bos and Kristina Kurze

The problem of democ­ratic backsliding as well as instru­ments to protect the rule of law have been acknowl­edged at the EU level for several years. However, no agreement on the intro­duction of a rule of law condi­tion­ality could be reached among the EU member states until the European Council summit in December 2020. Now, for the first time, the allocation of EU funds to member states is made condi­tional on the adherence to rule of law principles. To explain how this far-reaching decision became possible despite the persis­tence of deeply diverging interests between the member states, the article draws on the multiple streams framework. More precisely, it is argued that the coron­avirus crisis created an unpre­dictable window of oppor­tunity which was success­fully utilised to put the existing proposal for a rule of law mechanism on the agenda again and to finally reach an agreement on a respective regulation.


The New EU Migration and Asylum Pact: Will it Lead to More Solidarity between Member States? 

Florian Trauner

This article analyses the concept of compulsory but flexible “solidarity” within the new migration and asylum pact of the European Union (EU). Presented by the European Commission in September 2020, the pact inter­links EU asylum and return policy in an unprece­dented manner. If a government rejects the reset­tlement of asylum seekers within Europe, it can take respon­si­bility for the return of irregular migrants. The political momentum appears more favourable for the adoption of this proposal compared to previous reform efforts. The opera­tional imple­men­tation of the Commission’s plans will depend on whether the EU manages to persuade third countries to cooperate more closely. If this does not succeed, the EU internal conflicts on distri­b­ution and respon­si­bility-sharing are likely to persist – and may no longer only affect the relocation of asylum seekers, but also the reset­tlement of persons to be returned within the EU.


2020 as a Stress Test for the European Union: Challenges in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic 

Vittoria Meißner, Juha Jokela, Funda Tekin, Niklas Helwig, Marco Siddi and Tyyne Karjalainen

The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply shaken the European Union (EU) and exacer­bated existing problems. How can the EU gain more autonomy in an ever-changing world order, especially when it comes to inter­na­tional supply chains and health security? To what extent can EU member states reconcile their aspiration to build European sover­eignty with their efforts to forge multi­lat­er­alism? What does European resilience mean and what specific actions does the EU need to take in order to strengthen it? How can the EU’s green goals be achieved in times of the COVID-19 pandemic? In this paper, the authors examine the crisis year 2020 in order to present approaches and solutions to tackle these challenges from the perspective of Germany as well as the Nordic and Baltic states.


The Portuguese EU Council Presidency: Budget, Brexit, Biden, and Other Challenges 

Minna Ålander

On 1 January 2021, Portugal took over the rotating Presi­dency of the Council of the European Union for the fourth time. The preceding German Presi­dency was able to broker agree­ments on crucial topics such as the EU budget, Brexit and the new EU climate goal. Never­theless, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Portuguese Presi­dency is facing major challenges. History repeats itself as the German-Portuguese-Slovenian Trio Presi­dency again takes over at a time of crisis. Similarly to the trio’s last presi­dencies in 2007/2008, Portugal has again the respon­si­bility to ensure a quick and smooth imple­men­tation of the decisions taken under the German Presidency.


Directly order integration at Nomos Verlags­ge­sellschaft or in the bookstore.

integration is supported by the Federal Foreign Office.