Sie lesen aktuell unserer Archiv. Die aktuelle Webseite befindet sich unter: iep-berlin.de
You are currently reading our archive. The current webseite is located at: iep-berlin.de/en/

integration 4/2010

Two articles of the new issue of integration deal with the imple­men­tation of the Lisbon Treaty. One article examines the new role of the President of the European Council, while the other discusses the increased compe­tences of the German parliament in EU-policy. Other topics discussed are the current problems within the Eurozone and lessons that can be drawn from the Schuman Decla­ration for the EU’s future. Furthermore the IEP and the AEI report from four confer­ences dealing with different topics.


The Permanent President of the European Council: “Master” or “Servant” in the House of Europe?

Wolfgang Wessels and Thomas Traguth

This article argues that the new permanent president of the European Council is placed insti­tu­tionally in a dilemma between a national sover­eignty reflex and the propensity for joint problem solving. Following a principal-agent approach, the exami­nation of his powers and constraints reveal more of a managerial role than that of a full-blown presi­dential figure within his insti­tution. In a second step, the new office is analysed in view of the insti­tu­tional balance within the wider EU political system, namely the rotating presi­dency, the Foreign Affairs Council, the High Repre­sen­tative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy, the Commission and the European Parliament. It is argued that the heads of state and government carefully constructed insti­tu­tional and proce­dural brakes and multiple points of control to avoid drift and hierar­chical dominance of the new office. Thus, we conclude that the new permanent president is best described as a “first servant” ” of many masters ” within the EU insti­tu­tional architecture.


The German Legal Framework of the Lisbon Treaty as seen from the Perspective of the German Bundestag — Open Questions and New Challenges

Sebastian Gröning-von Thüna

One year after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and its German legal framework, the German Bundestag“s real involvement in EU-affairs reveals a mixed balance. Its legal and organ­i­sa­tional strength­ening are contrasted by the Bundestag“s lack of influence over decisions concerning measures for the stabil­i­sation of the Euro. Based on political practice, the author describes the Bundestag“s new possi­bil­ities and the challenges resulting from these. The analysis reveals that the legal speci­fi­cation of the parliament“s rights of infor­mation and partic­i­pation in EU affairs are only part of the expla­nation for the increased activity of the Bundestag. As much signif­i­cance can be attributed to the increased awareness that has resulted from the consti­tu­tional court“s ruling in July 2009 and the new laws.


Current Problems of the European Monetary Union

Martin Seidel

The European Union has again entered into crisis. Some member states of the Eurozone are so highly indebted that they currently face the very real threat of bankruptcy. These countries perma­nently have above average rates of inflation and balance of payments deficits, which negatively effect their economic compet­i­tiveness. The common currency, the Euro, is one of the biggest accom­plish­ments of European integration and depends on strict national budgetary disci­pline. In light of current events however, it now finds itself in danger. The European Union is trying to help these countries by means of financial assis­tance. In the case of Greece this assis­tance has taken the form of a “rescue plan” and as a further response the “European Stabil­i­sation Mechanism” has been created for use by all member states. In return, the said countries are forced to reduce public expen­diture and to increase taxes by draconian measures, which could result in public turmoil.


The Schuman Plan and the Future of the European Union

Wilfried Loth

The main motive behind Robert Schuman“s Plan of May 9, 1950 was to prevent Germany from estab­lishing a new indus­trial hegemony over France and Europe. It was accepted by the German Federal Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, because he was convinced of the necessity to integrate Germany into the West. Discreet American and British support helped the two statesmen to carry through the ambitious project against strong opposition at home. Thus, the corner­stone of European integration was a hidden peace treaty between France and Germany. This is why the EU perma­nently needs a joint Franco-German leadership. To concen­trate future actions on precise problems ” as Schuman and Adenauer did ” may help to develop the EU further.


TAGUNGEN

Zur Zukunft der Wirtschafts- und Währung­sunion: Integra­tionsschub wider Willen?

Bela Böhme, Manuel Mohr und Julian Plottka


ARBEITSKREIS EUROPÄISCHE INTEGRATION

Carsten Albers

Quo vadis Europa? Europäische Integra­tions- und Migra­tionspolitik in Vergan­genheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft

Frédéric Krumbein

Nationale Diskurse zur Europawahl 2009

Frédéric Krumbein

Die Zukunft war auch schon mal besser: Die EU im Jahr 2020