integration 3/2014

This issue of integration contains a compre­hensive and balanced overview of the 2014 European Parliament election results, partic­u­larly stressing the role of the leading European candi­dates. It is supple­mented by an article on the new Party statute adopted in May 2014, which is intended to pave the way for European Parties to become ʽreal parties’. Further, in Issue 3 an agenda for the new EU foreign affairs chief is presented, set against the background of the EU’s current foreign policy profile as well as the present situation in the inter­na­tional arena, and includes recent surveys regarding accep­tance and rejection of the EU in Germany, France, Spain, and Great Britain. Additionally, the govern­mental discourse of Merkel’s second government on the Euro Crisis and the resulting effects of this debate on the rationale and actions of the current Grand Coalition is analysed and evaluated. It also includes two conference reports on diver­gence and central­izing forces within the EU as well as on the functional changes of the European Parliament.

European Elections 2014: Continuity and New Elements

Rudolf Hrbek

Prior to the European elections in 2014 expec­ta­tions and fears were high. Some hoped that the elections would result in a democ­ratic revolution estab­lishing EU-level parlia­mentary democracy, as a result of the “front-runners,” which were presented by the European parties. Others feared that a high number of EU skeptic and non-aligned MEPs would obstruct the functioning of the new European Parliament. The article starts by discussing the overall political context in which the elections took place. It then presents the content of the European electoral manifestos and an analysis of the electoral campaigns and offers a comparison of the final election results to the predic­tions made before. In sum the author observes great conti­nuity in the whole process despite some new elements. He concludes that shifts in some national party systems could result in changes of national EU policies and have an impact upon EU decision-making. At the same time, however, and despite the new powers of the EP in the selection process of the Commission President EU, decisions will be based on the existing double legit­i­mation also in the future. The existing insti­tu­tional balance is likely to remain though with some potential for a gradual evolution of the EU political system like in the past.

From Party Alliances to “Real Parties” at European Level? Background, Content and Implications of the New Rules Governing European Political Parties

Jo Leinen and Fabian Pescher

Parties on the European level so far have not been able to suffi­ciently fulfil their mission under art. 10 par. 4 TEU to “contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union.” Although European parties have been able to receive funds from the budget of the European Union since 2004, they lacked the legal basis, compe­tences and resources to effec­tively fulfil the tradi­tional functions of political parties. Based on a critical review of the existing regulatory framework governing European parties stemming from the years 2003 and 2007, an analysis of the new regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political founda­tions is made. The new regulation was adopted by the European Parliament in May 2014 and will, for the first time, provide a European legal person­ality for European parties from January 1, 2017. Moreover, possible further steps to improve the condi­tions for European parties are examined, partic­u­larly the need to develop the European electoral system.

Lessons Learned – Recommendations for Reforming European External Policy

Stefan Lehne

The European Union is faced with mounting challenges in both the Eastern and Southern neigh­bourhood. At the beginning of this new insti­tu­tional cycle, it should, therefore, adjust its foreign policy toolbox to meet the new challenges. In concrete terms this would involve estab­lishing a functional “Relex Cluster” led by the High Repre­sen­tative in the new European Commission, clari­fying the division of work and improving coordi­nation between the members of the new EU leadership team, imple­menting substantial reforms in the context of the review of the European External Action Service scheduled for 2015, elabo­rating a new foreign policy strategy of the Union and funda­men­tally renewing of the European Neigh­borhood Policy.

Debating the Crisis in the Euro zone. An Analysis of the Merkel Government’s Discourse in the German Bundestag 2009–2012

Kai Oppermann

The European sovereign debt crisis is widely perceived by the German public as a strong threat and has great potential for domestic political mobil­i­sation. The German Federal Government, therefore, faces particular pressures to explain and justify its crisis policy in the public arena. An important instrument for this purpose is the speeches of government repre­sen­ta­tives in the German Bundestag, which can be under­stood as a strategic discourse in order to affect the framing of government policy in the broader public debate. Against this background, thearticle examines the parlia­mentary discourse about the Euro zone crisis of the CDU/CSU-FDP coalition government between 2009 and 2012. The analysis points to five basic lines of argument, which speak to the attempt of the Federal Government to maintain suffi­cient domestic leeway to pursue its preferred policy in the crisis.

European Integration and the Crisis in the Euro zone. Support and Rejection of the EU in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom

Oliver Bruttel

Against the background of the ongoing crisis in the euro zone over the past several years, the Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach conducted a series of four repre­sen­tative surveys in Germany, France, Spain and Great Britain in order to examine these population’s opinions and attitudes on the issue of European integration. The citizens of the EU countries included in the survey are generally ambivalent when it comes to both their country’s membership in the EU and to the Euro. However, at the same time, the majority of people in all four countries do not funda­men­tally question their country’s membership in the EU – yet they do wish that many EU compe­tences are trans­ferred back to the national level.


Ansgar Belke und Gunther Schnabl

Diver­genzen und krisenbe­d­ingte Zentral­isierung in der Europäischen Union

Martina Fürrutter, Regina Tschann und Michael Wolf

Das Europäische Parlament: Funktion­swandel und Aufgaben­profile 2014–2019

Bestellen Sie die integration direkt bei der Nomos Verlags­ge­sellschaft oder im Buchhandel.

Preise 2014: Jahresabon­nement Privat (Print­ausgabe inkl. Onlinezugang) 65 Euro; Jahresabon­nement für Studierende (Print­ausgabe inkl. Onlinezugang) 41 Euro; (bitte Studi­enbescheinigung zusenden); Jahresabon­nement für Insti­tu­tionen (Print­ausgabe inkl. Onlinezugang) 102 Euro; Einzelheft 18 Euro. Alle Preise verstehen sich inkl. MwSt. zzgl. Vertrieb­skosten (Vertrieb­skos­tenanteil 8,56 Euro, plus Direk­t­be­orderungs­gebühr Inland 1,61 Euro p.a.).

ISSN 0720–5120

Verlag: Nomos Verlags­ge­sellschaft – Waldseestr. 3–5 – 76530 Baden-Baden – Tel: +49 7221 2104–0 – Fax: +49 7221 2104–27